Arunabha Naskar v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.
02.12.2024 Item No. 36 Crt.No.02 b.r.
WPA 6509 of 2024 Arunabha Naskar -vsThe State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Pankaj Halder Mr. Tapas Manna .... For the petitioner.
Mr. Chandi Charan De, Ld. AGP Mr. Anirban Sarkar .... For the State.
Mr. Animesh Mukherjee .... For the Respondent no.8.
Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on record.
Mr. Pankaj Halder, learned counsel appears for the petitioner.
Mr. Chandi Charan De, learned Additional Government Pleader appears for Staterespondents no. 1 to 7.
The petitioner complains of an alleged encroachment and unauthorized construction on the PWD land at the behest of the private respondents.
The petitioner submitted a representation dated February 26, 2024, annexure p-3 at page-12 to the writ petition, but the same has not yet been dealt with.
Mr. Animesh Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for the private respondent no.8 denies and disputes the submissions made by the petitioner.
He further submits that no encroachment has ever been done by the private respondent.
In view of the above, the jurisdictional Block Land and Land Reforms Officer (B.L. & L.R.O) upon prior notice to the petitioner and the private respondents shall cause a physical inspection of the alleged encroachment and construction and shall submit his report before the petitioner, private respondents and jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD.
This exercise shall be carried out and completed by the jurisdictional B.L. & L.R.O. positively within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.
In the event such report confirms the alleged encroachment and construction on the PWD land then the Jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD after issuing a prior hearing notice of at least seven days to the petitioner and the private respondents and after giving them an opportunity of hearing shall decide said representation dated
February 26, 2024 as referred to above by passing a reasoned order in accordance with law.
The entire exercise shall be carried out and completed by the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD positively within a period of six weeks from the date of receiving report from the jurisdictional B.L. & L.R.O. The reasoned order shall be communicated to the petitioner and the private respondents positively within a period of two weeks from the date of the said reasoned order to be passed.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case of the petitioner or the private respondents and they shall be at liberty to urge whatever points they wish to urge by relying upon whatever records and documents they wish to rely upon before the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD.
In the event, the reasoned order confirms the alleged unauthorized construction and encroachment, jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD shall communicate the order to the jurisdictional Sub-Divisional Officer positively within a period of three weeks from the date of the said reasoned order to be passed, who shall take all necessary and consequential steps to give an
immediate effect to the said reasoned order in accordance with law, positively within four weeks from the date of receiving the reasoned order from the Assistant Engineer, PWD.
This order shall not create any right or equity in favour of the petitioner and in favour of the private respondents, if they do not succeed to their respective claims before the jurisdictional Assistant Engineer, PWD strictly in accordance with law. Since affidavits are not called for, the allegations made in this writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the respondents. With the above observations and directions, this writ petition, WPA 6509 of 2024 stands disposed of, without any order as to costs.
Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished expeditiously.
(Aniruddha Roy, J.)