Md. Abdul Odud Gazi v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

19.03.2021.

W.P.A. 7037 of 2021 ab Ct.

Md. Abdul Odud Gazi Vs The State West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Bidhan Biswas ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Mahadeb Sarkar ... For the State.

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is kept with the record.

The petitioner was a Teacher of a Primary School, South 24-Parganas and retired from service on 30.09.2008. The first pension payment order was issued on 02.07.2009. Under the ROPA Rules, 2009 there was revision of the pensionery and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner. The revised pension payment order was issued on 13.06.2013 and the revised pension was disbursed on 03.08.2013 in terms of ROPA Rules, 2009. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the revised arrear pension.

I have heard learned counsel for both parties and I have considered the orders passed by thiscourt in similar facts. It is settled law that retired employee is entitled to some amount of interest on delayed payment of revised arrear pension.

There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating

that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. No. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgement in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 S.C.C. 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or re-fixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party. In view of the above ad after hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised arrear pension calculated from 19.05.2009 till the date of payment.

Such payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. The writ petition is disposed of, however, no order as to costs.

Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to have been denied. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if

applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)