Chandan Maity v. State

D/L.26.

March 31, 2026.

KAUSHIK.

WPA No. 5594 of 2006 Chandan Maity Vs.

State None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call.

This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the petitioner had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing.

In view of the non-appearance of the petitioner, WPA 5594 of 2006 stands dismissed for default.

Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.

(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)