Pairag Mahato And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

06.04.2022 Serial no.42 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (DB) 908 of 2022 In re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 28.03.2022 in connection with Arsha P.S. Case No. 142 of 2021 dated 30.12.2021 under Sections 341/326/307/302/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. -AndIn the matter of: Pairag Mahato & Ors..

... ...Petitioners Mr. Abhra Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Sauradeep Dutta, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Advocate Mr. Suman De, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners seek bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that there was a property dispute between the private parties which lead to the incident.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the postmortem report of the victim, the contents of the first information report and the statement of the eye witnesses recorded under Section 161 and 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

There are materials in the case diary squarely implicating the petitioners in the incident of murder. Consequently, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.

CRM (DB) 908 of 2022 is rejected (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)