← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/6677/2026dismissed

Abdul Rohim v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2026-04-01Hon'Ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya2 pages

11.

11.

(DL) (DL) 01.04.2026 01.04.2026 Ct. No. 05 (ARPAN)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 6677 OF 2026 ABDUL ROHIM VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS ...............

Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Adv.

Mr. Koustav Lal Mukherjee, Adv.

Mr. Debayan Ghosh, Adv.

Ms. Sarmistha Basak, Adv.

Mr. Wasim Akram, Adv.

...for the Petitioner Ms. Jhuma Chakraborty, Adv. (Via VC) Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty, Adv.

...for the State Mr. Koushik Chatterjee, Adv.

Ms. Puja Dutta, Adv.

...for the Respondent No.4 Mr. Ranjit Kumar Jaiswal, Adv.

Mr. Md. Ali Jinnah, Adv.

Mr. Nandalal Pradhan, Adv.

Md. Moksul Talib Rahaman, Adv.

...for the Respondent No.10 Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das, Adv.

Ms. Deblina De, Adv.

...for the Respondent No.11 1.

Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

2.

During course of hearing Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that writ petition is not pressed.

3.

State respondents, respondent no.4, 10 and 11 are represented by learned advocates.

4.

In view of submission made on behalf of the petitioner, writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

5.

However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps, in accordance with law.

6.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)