← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/995/2023rejected

Urmila Naidu And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2023-03-21Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta1 pages

21.03.2023 Sl. No.34 akd [Rejected] C. R. M. (DB) 995 of 2023 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 09.03.2023 in connection with Kandi Police Station Case No.379 of 2022 dated 09.07.2022 under Sections 392/412/395 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re: Urmila Naidu & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. A. K. Upadhyay ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. Apurba Kumar Datta ... ... for the State Petitioners renew their prayer for bail. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about 255 days. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioners were identified in course of Test Identification parade. Bail prayer of the petitioners was rejected earlier on merits. There is no change in circumstance since then. Hence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage.

The application for bail is thus rejected.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)