Amarendra Nath Basu & ANR v. Jiban Das

06.05.2024 Court No. 15 Item No. 76(M/L) (Suvendu) CPAN 365 of 2018 With WPA 24156 of 2013 With CAN 1/2015 (CAN 11895/2015) CAN 2/ 2015 (CAN 11896/2015) CAN 3/2017 (CAN 11215/2017) Amarendra Nath Basu & Anr.

-VersusJiban Das Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Mitra Mr. Sugata Mukhopadhyay ....for the petitioners Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty ...for the respondent no.7 The learned advocate representing the writ petitioner no.2 /contempt applicant no. 2 submits that there are two writ petitioners /applicants out of which writ petitioner no. 1 /applicant no. 1 has died and the learned advocate received instruction not to proceed with the writ petition as well as the contempt application.

It is also submitted that the learned advocate representing the applicants has received written instruction in this regard from the writ petitioner no.2 /applicant no.2.

The respondent no. 7 is represented by the learned advocate.

In view of aforesaid submission, the writ petition and the contempt application are dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution.

Connected applications, if pending, stand also dismissed.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)