Kriti Singhania Mukherjee @ Kriti Singhania v. State Of West Bengal
C.R.R.777 of 2021 D/L42 10.01.2023 Bpg.
In Re: An application under Section 483 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973;
Kriti Singhania Mukherjee @ Kriti Singhania
Versus
The State of West Bengal Ms. Subhasree Patel.
...for the petitioner.
Mr. Arijit Ganguly, Ms. Manisha Sharma.
...for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner do not intend to press the present revisional application. As none appeared on behalf of the State, Mr. Arijit Ganguly, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State, is directed to represent the State. His appearance may be regularised by the concerned authorities.
In view of the prayers so advanced, the revisional application being CRR 777 of 2021 is dismissed as not pressed. Pending application, if any, is consequently disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)