Tanushri Nandy @ Tanushree Nandy v. State Of West Bengal

25.03.2025 Serial no. 70 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd CRM (A) 1008 of 2025 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with AJC Bose Botanic Garden Police Station Case No. 31 dated 06.02.2025 under Sections 318(4)/316(2)/351(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

-AndIn the matter of : TANUSHRI NANDY @ TANUSHREE NANDY ... ...Petitioner Mr. Bibek Jyoti Basu, Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw, Mr. Aman Kumar Singha, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. S. S. Imam, Mr. Abhisek Verma, Advocates ... ...For the State

1. Materials in the case diary require investigation.

2. Money transactions are involved. Petitioner was a party to an agreement in writing which apparently was used in the incidents.

3. Role of the petitioner requires investigations.

4. Enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail will be inimical to such investigations.

5. In such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. CRM (A) 1008 of 2025 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)