Mojibur Rahaman v. The State Of West Bengal

14.03.2024 Serial no. 06 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd CRM (A) 901 of 2024 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Manikchak Police Station Case No. 508 of 2023 dated 08.07.2023 under Sections 341/326/307/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 25(1-B) (a)/27/35 Arms Act and Sections 3/4 of E.S. Act with adding Section 120B of IPC. Charge sheet submitted under Sections 147/148/149/326/307/302 of IPC read with Sections 25(1B)(a)/27/35 of Arms Act and 3/4 of E.S. Act adding Sections 120B IPC.

-AndIn the matter of : Mojibur Rahaman ... ...Petitioner Mr. Sujoy Sarkar, Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk.

Mr. Rahul Chanchan, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed, APP Mr. Arabinda Manna, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the earlier application for grant of anticipatory bail was not pressed on October 12, 2023.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. He submits that an eye-witness recorded a statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code and named the petitioner as the person involved in the incident of murder. Considering the statement of the eye-witness as also other materials in the case diary, implicating the petitioner before us Signed By :

DEBABRATA DAS High Court of Calcutta 14 th of March 2024 02:34:26 PM

in the incident of murder, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 901 of 2024 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)