Manirul Hoque @ Md. Maniruddin v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

19.04.2024.

18.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 812 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bhutni P.S. Case No.184 of 2023 dated 20.08.2023 under Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

In the matter of : Manirul Hoque @ Md. Maniruddin. .... Petitioner.

Mr. Kalidas Saha, Ms. Mandira Mondal, Ms. Khushi Mollick.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Manoranjan Mahata.

...for the State.

1.

Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

2.

We have considered the materials on record. Report is placed on record. Parties have married each other under Muslim Law.

3.

In view of the aforesaid development, we are of the opinion further detention of the petitioner is not necessary and he may be enlarged on bail.

4.

Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Manirul Hoque @ Md. Maniruddin shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court under the POCSO Act, Malda subject to condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of April 2024 06:47:47 PM

5.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

6. This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of April 2024 06:47:47 PM