Dilip Kumar Datta v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

1913.

1913.

(ML) (ML) 23.04.2025 23.04.2025 Ct. No. 18 (ARPAN) W.P.A. 7197 OF 2024 Dilip Kumar Datta Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Others Mr. Banshi Badan Maity, Adv.

...for the Petitioner Ms. Jyotsna Roy Mukherjee, Adv.

...for the State In terms of the previous order notice dated 21st March, 2025 was served upon learned advocate representing the State respondents and same is taken on record.

State respondents are represented by learned advocate.

The writ petitioner is a retired Assistant Teacher, who superannuated on 30th June, 2019. After superannuation of the writ petitioner, first Pension Payment Order was issued on 25th July, 2019 and as per the first Pension Payment Order disbursement of retiral dues was made in favour of the petitioner. Subsequently, due to revision of pay as per ROPA 2019 revised Pension Payment Order was issued on 7th January, 2022. The writ petitioner claims interest on revised gratuity as per revised Pension Payment Order due to delayed payment.

Accordingly, the Director of Pension Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the concerned Treasury Officer are directed to pay interest at the rate of 8% per annum to the writ petitioner on revised

gratuity as per revised pension payment order from 14th February, 2020 till the date of actual disbursement of the revised gratuity amount in favour of the petitioner, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of communication of this order. Since no affidavit is called for, the allegations contained in the writ petition are deemed not to have been admitted.

With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)