Tapas Pramanick v. State Of West Bengal
18.05.2026 Serial no. 64 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 750 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kotwali PS Case No. 1325 of 2024 dated 03.12.2024 u/s 126(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109.
-AndIn the matter of : Tapas Pramanick ... Petitioner(s) Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Asraf Mondal ... for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Somnath Adhikary ... for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on December, 2024 and since then he is in custody; charges have been framed and five witnesses have already been examined. Learned advocate additionally submits that the prosecution has relied upon 16 witnesses in order to prove its case, as such, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail on any stringent condition.
Mr. Somnath Adhikary, learned advocate, appears for the State as per the directions of this court. His appointment may be regularized by the concerned authority. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary along with the Memo of Evidence. Learned
advocate submits that the prosecution intends to examine eight more witnesses.
I have taken into account the nature of injury inflicted as also the period of detention.
Having considered the same, without entering into the merits of the case but considering the period of detention of the present petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Tapas Pramanick shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned CJM, Krishnagar, Nadia.
If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of Nadia without prior intimation to the learned trial court. Additionally, the petitioner would, till the next date is fixed by the learned trial court, meet with the Officer-incharge of Kotwali Police Station once in a week. It would be the discretion of the learned trial court whether to continue
with such conditions and/or waive the condition(s) concerned.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 750 of 2026 is allowed.
Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)