← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (NDPS)/466/2023rejected

Sanu Bhutia And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2023-03-23Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

23.03.2023 Sl. No.8 akd [Rejected] C. R. M. (NDPS) 466 of 2023 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 16.03.2023 in connection with Nabagram Police Station Case No.24 of 2020 dated 11.01.2020 under Sections 22(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. (NDPS Case No.16 of 2020) And In Re: Sanu Bhutia & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Dhanasree Biswas Ms. Poulami Bose Ms. Chandrima Debnath ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Rudradipta Nandy .. ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mrs. Sonali Das Ms. Sreeparna Das ... ... for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about three years and two months. It is further submitted prosecution witnesses have turned hostile.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Independent witnesses have turned hostile. They however, admitted their signatures on the seizure list and other documents. Official witnesses are yet to be examined. Trial is in progress. Under such circumstances and in view of the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

The application for bail is thus rejected.

Trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date preferably within one year from the next date fixed for recording evidence without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

Parties shall communicate a copy of this order to the trial court for due compliance.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)