Jyotirmay Kayal v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

19.3.2021 392,ct.15 sk W.P.A.7666 of 2021 Jyotirmay Kayal Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Banshi Badan Maity ...for the petitioner.

No one appears for the State when the matter is called on for hearing.

Affidavit of service filed in Court today is kept with the record.

The petitioner retired from service on 31.08.1996 from the concerned school. The first pension payment order was issued on 11.08.1998. Under the ROPA Rules, 1998 there was revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount and arrear pension amount pension amount payable to the petitioner. The revised pension payment order was issued on 03.09.2003 and the revised gratuity amount was disbursed on 14.10.2003 in terms of ROPA, 1998 belatedly. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the revised gratuity amount.

There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.No. 17557(W) of 2017( Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon the Supreme Court judgement in the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 S.C.C. 648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or re-fixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court

had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party. In view of the aforesaid, I direct the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the writ petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised gratuity amount calculated on and from 1.04.1998 till actual date of payment within a period of eight weeks from the date or communication of this order to the concerned authorities.

The writ petition is disposed of, however, no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J. )