Asman Khan @ Bhutta Khan And ORS v. State Of West Bengal
13.04.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1712 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 231 of 2022 dated 30.03.2022 under Sections 341/379/354/325/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
And In Re : Asman Khan @ Bhutta Khan & Ors.
...... petitioners Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee ....for the petitioners Mr. Saibal Bapuli Mr. Arijit Ganguly ....for the State Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners were falsely implicated. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report and the statement of the injured recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the materials in the case diary. Considering the nature of injury suffered by the victim and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)