Pinku Hoque @ Selim Aktar v. State Of West Bengal
C.R.M. (A) 1717 of 2022 (AD) 18.04.2022 Court No.29 (Rejected) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Ratua P.S. Case No.563 of 2021 dated 14.10.2021 under Sections 379/411/413/414 of the Indian Penal Code.
And In the matter of: - Pinku Hoque @ Selim Aktar ...petitioner.
Mr. Kalidas Saha ... for the petitioner.
Mr. Neguive Ahamed, Ld. APP Ms. Ayantika Ray ...for the State.
Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is without any criminal antecedent. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the stolen article was recovered from the house belonging to the petitioner.
Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
C.R.M. (A) 1717 of 2022 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)