← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1085/2023rejected

Parimal Patar v. State Of West Bengal

2023-03-24Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

24.03.2023.

38.

Ct.No.28 as (Rejected) C.R.M. (DB) 1085 of 2023 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Jambani P. S. Case No.02 of 2018 dated 15.01.2018 under Sections 302/201 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Parimal Patar.

... Petitioner.

Ms. Rituparna Ghosh.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Partha Pratim Das, Mr. Manoranjan Mahata.

...for the State.

Petitioner is in custody since 2018. There is delay in trial. He prays for bail.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the bail prayer. He submits three out of twelve witnesses have already been examined.

We have considered the materials on record. There are materials connecting the petitioner with the murder. Trial is in progress. Three witnesses have already been examined. Under such circumstances though we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, we direct the trial court to conclude the trial at an early date preferably within one year from the next date fixed for recording evidence without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Parties shall communicate this order to the trial court for necessary compliance.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)