Krishna Kandar@Trishna Kandar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

19.04.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1746 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Durgachak Police Station Case No. 166 of 2021 dated 27.09.2021 under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Krishna Kandar @ Trishna Kandar & Anr. ...... petitioners Mr. Dipayan Kundu ....for the petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Avik Ghatak ....for the State Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet and considering the fact that the husband was granted bail by the Jurisdictional Court and considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and

from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)