Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1771/2022allowed

Sujit Singhania v. State Of West Bengal

2022-04-20Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De3 pages

20.04.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1771 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Eco Park Police Station Case No. 20 of 2022 dated 19.01.2022 under Sections 341/427/506/509/500/420/468/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Sujit Singhania ...... petitioner Mr. Sandip Chakraborty Mr. Suvendu Hazra Mr. Koustav Das ....for the petitioner Mr. Sandipan Ganguly Mr. Ayan Chakraborty Ms. Sohini Mukherjee ....for the de-facto complainant Mr. Madhusudan Sur Mr. Dipankar Pramanick ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. The de-facto complainant is represented.

The disputes relate to and arises out of Housing Complex Residents Association.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)