Paritosh Mandal @ Poritosh Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 1775 of 2022 02.05.2022 Sl. 4 Court No.29 sourav (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed in connection with Baruipur Police Station Case No. 266 of 2022 dated 14.02.2022 under Sections 498A/306/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In the matter of: Paritosh Mandal @ Poritosh Mondal ....petitioner.

Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya ...for the petitioner.

Mr. P. P. Das Ms. Amita Gaur ...for the State.

Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty ...for the defacto complainant.

Supplementary affidavit filed in Court be taken on record. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner opened a bank account with his daughter. The petitioner will deposit 1/3rd of his salary in such bank account till such time that his daughter attains the age of majority. The petitioner will also take care of the educational requirement of his daughter.

State and the defacto complainant are represented. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary and considering the supplementary affidavit filed in Court and considering the stand of the petitioner as noted above, we enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties

of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 1775 of 2022 is, thus disposed of. It is placed on record that the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner made over the passbook of the bank account as well as the demand draft for the first month maintenance for the daughter to the learned advocate for the defacto complainant. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)