← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1143/2023allowed

Abhijit Bag v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2023-04-10Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi (27.06.2011 - 29.08.2020),Hon'Ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen2 pages

10.04.2023 sdas allowed CRM(DB) No. 1143 of 2023 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chanditala Police Station Case No. 352 dated 27.07.2022 under Sections 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal read with Section 6(1) of the POCSO Act. And In Re : Abhijit Bag ...... petitioner Mr. Amajit De Ms. Shakshi Rathi Mr. Pratik Acharjee ....for the petitioner Mr. Atif Ahmed Siddiqui .... for the State Mr. Bholanath Ghosh Mr. S. D. Adhikary .... for de facto complainant Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits he is in custody for 265 days. It is also submitted there was a love affair between the parties. He prays for bail.

Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Learned Counsel for the defacto complainant submits his client was a minor. Parties got acquainted over social media. Subsequently she was raped.

We have considered the materials on record. Statement of the minor discloses there was an intimate relationship between the parties. Though the victim is a minor and her consent is not relevant it cannot also be lost sight of that there was an intimate relationship between two young persons. Allegation of forcible/ coercive rape also requires to be assessed in the light of the

aforesaid prevailing relationship. Keeping in mind the aforesaid facts and the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are inclined to grant bail to him.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Serampore, Hooghly, subject to conditions that petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)