← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1778/2022allowed

Milandip Biswas v. State Of West Bengal

2022-04-20Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De3 pages

20.04.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1778 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nakashipara Police Station Case No. 652 of 2021 dated 18.12.2021 under Sections 363/365/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and added Section 8 of the POCSO Act. And In Re : Milandip Biswas ...... petitioner Mr. Koustav Bagchi Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Debayan Ghosh ....for the petitioner Mr. Navanil De ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, there was a relationship between the petitioner and the victim. The victim went voluntarily with the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). In her 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the victim states that she went voluntarily with the petitioner and that they were married. The age of the victim is 16 years plus.

Considering the 164 Cr.P.C. statement of the victim and considering the age of the petitioner, we deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)