Mainul Islam @ Mainul Sk v. State Of West Bengal

13.10.2023

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.34 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc.

C.R.R. 1122 of 2023 In the matter of : Mainul Islam @ Mainul Sk ... Petitioner. Md. Wasim Akram ... For the Petitioner.

Records of the revisional application reflect that only the report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been enclosed. None of the documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been enclosed along with the present revisional application. During the investigation, the accused was not available and as such, the charge-sheet was submitted showing the accused as absconding. Subsequently after submission of the chargesheet on the same date, the accused/petitioner surrendered before the court and was granted bail.

Having considered that the charge-sheet, which is the report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, having been only enclosed and none of the documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been enclosed along with the revisional application or the enclosed order-sheet reflects that the documents under Section 207 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been supplied, I am of the opinion that the revisional application is premature. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court at the appropriate stage of the case. No interference is made at this stage.

With the aforesaid observations, the revisional application being CRR 1122 of 2023 is disposed of. Pending connected application, if any, is consequently disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)