← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPCRC/91/2024disposed

Iva Naskar Alias Mukherjee v. Haren Ghorui

2025-07-03Hon'Ble Justice Amrita Sinha3 pages

03-07-2025 Item no.85

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Civil Jurisdiction Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) Appellate Side WPCRC No.91 of 2024 Iva Naskar alias Mukherjee Vs Haren Ghorui with CAN No.1 of 2025 arising out of WPA No.9206 of 2022 Mr. Mrinal Kanti Ghosh ...for the petitioner Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick Mr. Sayan Ganguly ...for contemnor no. 6 Mr. Rabindranath Mahato Mr. Hasanuzzaman Mr. Aritra Shankar Ray Md. Zeeshanuz Zaman ...for the applicants 1.

The matter relates to unauthorized construction. It appears that the Pradhan has come to a finding that the plan was not sanctioned properly. The Pradhan has sought instructions from the Sub-Divisional Officer with regard to demolition of the subject structure which is alleged to be constructed unauthorizedly by the petitioner.

2.

According to law, the Pradhan is not authorized to pass an order of demolition. The Pradhan is required to forward the entire file to the Sub-Divisional Officer for taking necessary steps in respect of the construction complained of.

3.

Learned counsel for the Pradhan submits that the matter is pending before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Canning Town.

4. From the communication of the Pradhan dated June 16, 2025 it is not very clear as to whether the entire file relating to unauthorized construction has been forwarded to the Pradhan or not.

5.

The Pradhan is, accordingly, directed to forward the entire file dealing with the unauthorized construction to the Sub-Divisional Officer within a fortnight from date. The Sub-Divisional Officer shall give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the persons who are responsible for making unauthorized construction namely Biplab Naskar and others. After hearing both the parties, the SubDivisional Officer shall pass necessary order in the matter in accordance with law. The Sub-Divisional Officer will act upon within eight weeks from the date of receiving the file from the Pradhan.

6.

The Contempt Rule stands discharged; the contempt application is disposed of.

7.

CAN No.1 of 2025 filed for addition of party by Biplab Naskar and others stands allowed.

8.

All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

[Amrita Sinha, J]