← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/7391/2025disposed

Kaushik Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2025-04-21Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

D/L 28 21.04.2025 Bpg.

ct.no.35 W.P.A. 7391 of 2025 Kaushik Chakraborty

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Devi Priya Mitra Mr. Supriyo Ghosh Ms. Susmita Adhikary.

...for the petitioner.

Mr. Joydip Banerjee Ms. Mousumi Banerjee.

...for the State-respondents.

Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner be kept with the record.

Petitioner is aggrieved that there has been no application of mind in respect of the investigation carried out in connection with Netaji Nagar Police Station Case No.223 of 2024 wherein the police authorities while submitting the charge-sheet named a witness who has expired.

Learned advocate for the State has submitted a report. Report reflects that the same was a clerical error which was subsequently corrected by informing the jurisdictional court. Report also reflects that the typographical error was insertion in the list of witnesses, the name of one Sankar Ganguly, the father of the de facto complainant as CSW-2.

However, the actual CSW-2 would be Sandip Ganguly. The same was brought to the notice of the

learned ACJM, Alipore and necessary prayers were allowed by the concerned court.

Having considered that steps have been taken and amendments have taken place, petitioner at this stage do not make out any case for interference by this Court. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved, petitioner would take up all the issues canvassed in the present writ petition along with other necessary points before the learned jurisdictional criminal court at the time of consideration of charges.

With the aforesaid observations, WPA 7391 of 2025 is disposed of.

There will be no order as to costs.

Report submitted by the State be kept with the record.

A copy of the report be handed over to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)