Haidar Ali Sk v. The State Of West Bengal And ORS.

M/L 138 18.08.2025 Bpg.

ct.no.35 W.P.A.9586 of 2024 Haidar Ali Sk.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. Tanima Sengupta.

...for the State-respondents.

Mr. Robiul Islam Mr. M. Rahaman.

...for the respondent nos.10 to 15.

Earlier when the writ petition was called on 12.12.2024, an accommodation was prayed for on behalf of the petitioner. Today, when the writ petition has been called, petitioner is not represented. As none appears on behalf of the State, Ms.

Tanima Sengupta, learned advocate, is directed to represent the State.

Her appearance may be regularized by the concerned authorities.

Mr. Robiul Islam, learned advocate, appears for the respondent nos.10 to 15.

In view of the petitioner not being interested to pursue the present writ petition, WPA 9586 of 2024 is dismissed for default.

Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)