← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(R)/1/2025dismissed

Jaleswar Shaw v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2025-04-23Hon'Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak2 pages

23.04.2025 Court No.39 D/L 1 ab (rejected)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRM (R) 1 OF 2025 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/ Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Halisahar P.S. Case No. 74 of 2024 dated 04.04.2024 under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. And In the matter of: Jaleswar Shaw . .. . . . . .Petitioner. Mr. Debasis Kar, Mr. Husen Mustafi ... For the Petitioner.

Ms. Shaila Afrin, Mr. Manoranjan Mahata ... For the State.

Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. Service report filed by the State is also taken on record.

Despite service, none appears on behalf of the de facto complainant Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that out of grudge, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. After completion of investigation, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and the petitioner is in custody for about one year. He seeks for enlargement of the petitioner on bail.

Learned advocate for the State opposing such prayer for bail submits that as per statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, there are specific allegations against the petitioner. She seeks for dismissal of the bail application.

Perused the case diary and the materials on record. The victim is aged about 5 years. From the Statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, there are serious allegations against the petitioner of his involvement in the alleged offence. Considering the materials as indicated above and bearing in mind the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused/petitioner on bail. The prayer for bail is rejected.

Accordingly, CRM (R) 1 of 2025 is dismissed.

However, Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at an early date without granting unnecessary adjournments.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.)