← Library
Calcutta High CourtSA/135/2019disposed

Prakash Chand Vaidya & ORS v. Shaheen Khan

2023-10-04Hon'Ble Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury2 pages

19.10.2023 ct. 236 sk,sl. 8 S.A.135 of 2019 Prakash Chand Vaidya & Ors.-vs-Shakil Ahmed .

Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh, Ld. Sr. Adv.

Mr. Rwitendra Banerjee Mr. Siddhartha Paul Mr. Janardhan Mondal ...for the appellants.

Mr. Dipta Dipak Banerjee Mr. Joydeep Chatterjee Mr. Diwakar Pathak Ms. Nilakshmi Ghosh ........for the respondent.

1.

Shakil Ahmed was the original appellant before the court at whose instance second appeal being SA 135 of 2019 was admitted.

During pendency of the appeal Shaheen Khan filed an application under Order 22 Rule 10, having acquired interest in the suit property by purchase.

2.

Accordingly, Shaheen Khan was substituted in place of Shakil Ahmed but in the cause title of judgment the name of Shakil Ahmed was typed inadvertently as respondent in place and stead of Saheen Khan.

3.

Another typographical mistake has crept in the second line of the first paragraph of the

judgment where Title Appeal No. 129 of 2017 has been written as 1296 of 2017.

4.

This typographical mistakes be therefore removed. The cause title of the judgment be corrected.

Server copy be also corrected accordingly.

(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J)