Arjul Dafadar And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

26.04.2022 Serial no.20 Aloke Ct. No. 29 CRM (A) 1874 of 2022 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 20.04.2022 in connection with Hanskhali P.S. Case No. 611 of 2021 dated 26.08.2021 under Sections 341/325/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

-AndIn the matter of: Arjul Dafadar & Ors.

... ...Petitioners Mr. Atis Kr. Biswas, Advocate Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate Mr. Jyoti Agarwal, Advocate ... ... For the Petitioners Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. APP Mr. Soumik Ganguli, Advocate ... ... For the State Petitioners renew the prayer for anticipatory bail. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the at the time of earlier rejection on January 11, 2022 the charge-sheet was not filed. Presently, the police filed charge-sheet.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention to the materials in the case diary. The petitioners were named in the charge-sheet as accused.

Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

CRM (A) 1874 of 2022 is rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)