Vivek Poddar v. State Of West Bengal
12.06.2026
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Item No.222 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.
Not Pressed C.R.M. (M) 851 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Shyampukur Police Station/DD Case No. of dated 13.12.2025 under Sections 120B/408/420/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (G.R. Case No. 1340 of 2025).
And In Re :
Vivek Poddar ... Petitioner.
Mr. Abdul Zahid ... For the Petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw ... For the State.
Mr. Avik Ghatak, Mr. Soumya Nag, Mr. Abhinav Rakshit, Mr. Rajdeep Sengupta ... For the de facto complainant.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has received written instructions for not proceeding with the present bail application.
Mr. Ghatak, learned advocate appears for the de facto complainant.
Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw, learned advocate, is directed to represent the State. His appointment may be regularised by the concerned authorities.
In view of the prayer advanced on behalf of the petitioner, the application for bail being CRM (M) 851 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed.
Let the written instructions submitted by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner be kept with the record.
All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)