Maharaj Sk v. State Of West Bengal

10.04.2025 Item No.10 Ct.No.34 rc.

Reject C.R.M. (M) 46 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nalhati Police Station Case No. 349 of 2024 dated 22.06.2024 under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re :

Maharaj Sk.

... Petitioner Mr. Subhabrata Datta Ms. Debjani Roy Chaudhuri ... for the Petitioner Mrs. Anasuya Sinha Mr. Subhasish Datta ... For the State.

The petitioner is in custody for less than a year. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and has been implicated on the basis of circumstantial evidence.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner is the second husband of one of the victims and was seen to have taken both the victims away with him in his motor bike prior to the death of the victims. The offending weapon was recovered pursuant to the leading statement of the petitioner.

Considering the material available in the Case Diary connecting the petitioner to the alleged offence as well as gravity of the offence, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The application is disposed of.

Case Diary is returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)