Pijus Pramanick @ Sasti v. State Of West Bengal

10.04.2025 Item No.15 Ct.No.34 rc.

Allowed C.R.M. (M) 49 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in connection with Ranaghat G.R. Police Station Case No. 09 of 2021 dated 27.06.2021 under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

And In Re :

Pijush Pramanick @ Sasti ... Petitioner.

Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya ... for the Petitioner.

Ms. Zareen Khan Ms. Sreetama Das ... For the State.

Heard learned counsels for the parties.

Petitioner seeks parity with co-accused, Anup Roy who stands on the same footing. The petitioner is in custody for three years nine months.

I have considered the material on record. It appears that the petitioner is similarly circumstanced with co-accused Anup Roy who has been granted bail by this Court earlier. Further detention of the petitioner is not required. Accordingly, prayer for bail is allowed.

The petitioner, Pijush Pramanick @ Sasti , be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia subject to condition that he shall appear before the learned

trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the learned trial court on any date without justifiable cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, thus, disposed of. Case Diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)