Anindita Kar v. State Of West Bengal

29.04.2022 Serial no. 60 [Dd] (Bail allowed) CRM (DB) 1102 of 2022 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Taldangra Police Station Case No. 85 of 2021 dated 31st October, 2021 under Sections 341/325/302/506/120B of the Indian Penal Code corresponding to G.R. No. 520 of 2021.

-AndIn the matter of : Anindita Kar ... ... Petitioner Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, Ms. Somsubhra Ganguly, Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. APP Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya, Advocates ... ...For the State Petitioner prays for bail on the ground of parity with that of other co-accsueds who were enlarged on bail by order dated March 23, 2022 in CRM (DB) 438 of 2022 and other orders.

Learned advocate appearing for the State does not dispute the contention of parity.

Considering the claim for parity not disputed on behalf of the State, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khatra, Bankura subject to condition that the petitioner

shall appear before the learned trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event, the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. CRM (DB) 1102 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)