Himangsu Mondal @ Himansu Mondal v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

D/L10 09.04.2026 C.R.M. (M) 864 of 2026 In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Hanskhali Police Station Case No.573 of 2024 dated 09.08.2024 under Sections 64/78/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 and charge-sheet submitted under Sections 64/78/351(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of POCSO Act, 2012 Section 14/15 of POCSO Act, 2012 ; Himangsu Mondal @ Himansu Mondal

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Raja Das.

...for the petitioner.

Ms. ZareenN. Khan Mr. Atif Ahmed.

...for the State.

Mr. Manabendranath Bandyopadhyay.

...for the de facto complainant.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits Bpg.

Dismissed as not pressed that he has instructions not to proceed with the bail application. Learned advocate for the State and the de facto complainant are present.

In view of the submissions advanced by the petitioner, the application for bail being CRM(M)864 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)