The State Of West Bengal v. Sreeparna Sadhukhan @Mamoni And ORS

16.01.2024 Ct.No.28 as C.R.M. (DB) 1302 of 2023 In Re : An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In Re : The State of West Bengal ......petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, learned APP Ms. Sonali Das ...... for the State/petitioner Ms. Jeenia Rudra, Ms. M. Chanda .... for the opposite party Nos.2 & 3.

Mr. Amajit De, Ms. Shakshi Rathi, Mr. Pratik Acharjee.

...for the opposite party No.1.

1.

Petitioner/State has sought cancellation of bail against opposite parties/accused. It is contended they were members of an organized racket and cheated various individuals through cyber fraud.

2.

Learned Advocate for all the opposite parties/accused have been served with notice. 3.

Learned Advocate for opposite parties/accused submits they have duly complied with the conditions of bail.

4.

We have considered the materials on record. The said opposite parties were in custody for a considerable period of time. Considering the relevant facts and the extent of their involvement in the crime, they had been

enlarged on bail. Thereafter, they had complied with the conditions of bail.

5.

Accordingly, we are not inclined to interfere with the liberty granted to the said opposite parties. 6.

Accordingly, the application being CRM (DB) 1302 of 2023 is disposed of.

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)