Ejajul Gazi And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

29.04.2022 C.R.M. (DB) 1132 of 2022 (AD) Court No.29 In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Canning P.S. Case No.494 of dated 21.11.2021 under Sections 302/120B/201/212 of the Indian Penal Code and read with Sections 27/35 of Arms Act.

And (Rejected) In the matter of: Ejajul Gazi & Ors.

....petitioners.

Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharjee, Sr, Advocate Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Suman Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Santanu Maji Ms. Trisha Rakshit ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. APP Mr. Dipankar Paramanick ... for the State.

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Anirban Guha Thakurata Mr. Sraman Sarkar Mr. Angshuman Chakraboprty Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha ... for the de facto complainant.

Petitioners seek bail.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the police submitted charge sheet. The petitioners are in custody in excess of 150 days. He submits that there is no material implicating any of the petitioners. Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the seizure list and to the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

De facto complainant is represented.

Seizure was made from the petitioner nos.2 and 3. A vehicle was seized from the property belonging to the petitioner no.1. Such vehicle was used to carry the people for the murder. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant bail to any of the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected.

C.R.M. (DB) 1132 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)