Rakibul Tarafdar And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

29.04.2022 23, 30 & 31 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK REJECTED C.R.M.(A) 1967 of 2022 with C.R.M.(A) 1974 of 2022 with C.R.M.(A) 1975 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Haroa Police Station Case No. 67 of 2022 dated 09.03.2022 under Sections 341/326/307/379/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Mohibul Molla & Ors.

...... petitioners Mr. K. Bhattacharya Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya ....for the petitioners in all the applications Mr. Sk. Sahjahan Ali Mr. Aniket Mitra ....for the de-facto in all the applications Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Ms. Baisakhi Chatterjee ....for the State in CRM(A) 1967 of 2022 Ms. Anasuya Sinha Ms. Jonaki Saha ....for the State in CRM(A) 1974 of 2022 Mr. Binoy Panda Mr. Subham Bhakat ....for the State in CRM(A) 1975 of 2022 Three applications for anticipatory bail are taken up for consideration analogously as they emanate out of the same police case.

State and the de-facto complainant are represented.

Considering the nature of injury suffered by the victim and considering the materials in the case diary and considering the involvement of the petitioners in the incident, we are unable to enlarge any of the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected and the applications being CRM (A) 1967 of 2022, CRM (A) 1974 of 2022 and CRM (A) 1975 of 2022 are dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)