Damur Singh Tubid v. State Of West Bengal

25.04.2025 jb.

jdt.

C.R.M. (M) 87 of 2025 In Re : An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatia Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in connection with Jhargram Police Station Case No. 236 of 2024 dated 12.08.2024 under Sections 103(1)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

And In Re : Damur Singh Tubid ... Petitioner.

Abdur Rakib Mr. Shraman Sarkar Mujahid Mehedi ... For the Petitioner.

Ms. Rituparna De Ghose Mr. Santanu Talukdar ... For the State The petitioner is in custody for 8 years and prays for bail. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record.

The petitioner was in the same room as the victim when the alleged incident occurred. He appears to be the principal assailant who assaulted the victim leading to his death. The petitioner owes an explanation under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act which may be dealt with at the appropriate stage of the proceeding.

Considering the material on record as well as the gravity of the offence, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage The application for bail is disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite

formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)