Union Of India v. Manju Goyel

30.03.2023 Ct. No.237 pg.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE IA No. CAN 1 of 2012 (CAN 7200 of 2012) with CAN 2 of 2013 (CAN 2311 of 2013) in FMAT 342 of 2012 The Union of India Vs.

Smt. Manju Goyel & Ors.

Mr. Debapriya Samanta ... For the appellant/Union of India Mr. Debapriya Samanta, learned advocate, appears on behalf of the appellant/Union of India. Mr. Samanta's engagement may be regularised by the authority concerned.

Learned advocate on behalf of the appellant/Union of India has submitted that he has been instructed to withdraw the appeal, being FMAT 342 of 2012, as all the awarded amount was disbursed in favour of the claimants. A written instruction said to have been issued by the appellant/Union of India to his advocate and made over to Court is taken on record.

In view of the above, the appeal, being FMAT 342 of 2012, stands dismissed as not pressed.

The connected applications, being CAN 1 of 2012 (CAN 7200 of 2012) and CAN 2 of 2013 (CAN 2311 of 2013), stand dismissed accordingly.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of necessary formalities.

(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)