Rejabul Sarkar @ Ijabul @ Eajabul @ Ejabul And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

(AD) 30.09.2021 C.R.M. 3191 of 2021 (Via Video Conference) Court No.29 (Allowed) In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 07/04/2021 in connection with Tapan P.S. Case No. 354 of 2020 dated 10/11/2020 under Sections 498A/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. And In the matter of: Rejabul Sarkar @ Ijabul @ Eajabul @ Ejabul & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Kaushik Chaudhury Ms. Busra Khatoon ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Ld. PP Mr. Aniket Mitra ...for the State.

Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the principal accused being the husband was granted bail by the coordinated Bench. The police submitted charge sheet and, therefore, custodial interrogation of the petitioners are not required.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the dying declaration and the other materials available in the case diary.

Considering the fact that the husband was enlarged on bail by a coordinate Bench and considering that the police submitted charge sheet, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the

petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that they shall appear before the jurisdictional Court on the date fixed and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 3191 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)