Farhina Yeasmin v. Union Of India & ORS

W.P.A 7192 of 2019 Court No. 24 16.08.2021 FARHINA YEASMIN VS UNION OF INDIA & ORS (Item No. 44) (AB) Mr. Sudipto Panda Ms. Munmun Tewary ........ for the State Mr. Puspendu Chakrobarty ........ for IOCL None appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated occasions. No accommodation has been sought for.

An opportunity was given to the petitioner to file affidavit-in-reply to the opposition filed by the respondent Nos. 2 to 6. That has also not been filed. The learned advocate for the Company submits that the distributorship granted in favour of the private respondents has already started functioning.

As there is no representation from the petitioner at present the writ petition stands dismissed for default.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)