← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1135/2024partly allowed

Animesh Ghosh And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

2024-04-04Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

04.04.2024 Item No.60 AD/SD Court No.28 (Partly Allowed) C.R.M. (A) No. 1135 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Beldanga Police Station Case No. 885 of 2023 dated 28.11.2023 under Sections 341/326/307/354/406/379/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 presently pending before the Court of the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Berhampore, Murshidabad. (G.R. Case No.5621 of 2023) And In Re : Animesh Ghosh & Ors.

..... petitioners Mr. Mrityunjoy Chatterjee Mr. Debapriya Majumder Mr. Arindam Poali .....for the petitioners Ms. Anasuya Sinha, Ld. APP Ms. Rajnandini Das ....for the State

1. Petitioners submit that they are the family members of the principal accused. They did not participate in the assault of the victim. They pray for anticipatory bail.

2. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. We have considered the materials on record. Victim was an agent of a finance company. He had gone to the residence of the petitioners to recover a loan. He was assaulted by one Nibesh Ghosh, the husband of petitioner no.3, who had taken loan.

4. Petitioner no.1 had instigated Nibesh to assault the victim. Hence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.1, Animesh Ghosh.

5. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 is rejected.

Signed By :

ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 5 th of April 2024 03:56:06 PM

6. Petitioner no.2 is the mother of the petitioner no.1, Animesh Ghosh. Though, she was present at the place of occurrence and had merely asked the victim to go away. There is no allegation that she participated in the assault. There is also no allegation that petitioner no.3 assaulted the victim. Hence, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to them.

7. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest petitioner no.2 (Lila Ghosh @ Lilarani Ghosh) and petitioner no.3 (Susmita Ghosh) shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that petitioner nos.2 and 3 shall appear before the jurisdictional Court and pray for regular bail within a period of four weeks from date.

8. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner nos.2 and 3 is allowed.

9. C.R.M. (A) No. 1135 of 2024 is disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 5 th of April 2024 03:56:06 PM