Purushottam Panedy v. Bhartendu Kr. Mishra

29.06.2022.

C.P.A.N. 837 of 2003 in WPA 6490 of 2002 Purushottam Panedy Vs.

Bhartendu Kr. Mishra ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)