← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1194/2022allowed

Subodh Sarkar And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-05-05Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

AD 05.05.2022 Ct. No.29 (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 1194 of 2022 In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Shantipur P.S. Case No.740 of dated 21/09/2021 under Sections 341/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Subodh Sarkar & Anr.

....petitioners.

Mr. Prabir Majumder Mr. Snehansu Majumder ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Prasun Kumar Datta, Ld. APP Mr. Santanu Deb Roy Md. Kutubuddin ...for the State.

Petitioners seek bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody for a period of 50 days. The police submitted charge sheet and, therefore, further detention of the petitioners is not required.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Considering the period of detention of the petitioners and considering the fact that the police submitted charge sheet, we grant bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia, subject to the condition that during bail the petitioners shall appear before the learned trial court on

every date of hearing and that the petitioners shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event the petitioners fail to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without any further reference to this Court. The prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed. The application for bail being C.R.M. (DB) 1194 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)