Sentu Mondal And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

08.04.2024 Sl. No.39 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (DB) 1027 of 2024 In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 15.03.2024 in connection with Raninagar Police Station Case No.431 of 2023 dated 10.08.2023 under Sections 341/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R. Case No.2644 of 2023) And In Re: Sentu Mondal & Anr.

... ... Petitioners Mr. Ali Ahasan Alamgir Ms. Soma Mal Ms. Rabia Khatoon ... ... for the petitioners Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Mainak Gupta ... ... for the State

1. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about 60 days. Accordingly, they pray for bail.

2. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

3. We have considered the materials on record including the injury report. Balancing the nature of accusation with the period of detention suffered by the petitioners, we are of the opinion further detention of the petitioners is not necessary.

4. Therefore, the petitioners, namely (1) Sentu Mondal & (2) Hasikul Islam @ Hasibul Islam, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, Murshidabad subject to condition that the said petitioners shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

Signed By :

ARUP KUMAR DAS High Court of Calcutta 9 th of April 2024 04:11:29 PM

5. In the event they fail to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail automatically without reference to this court.

6. The application for bail, thus, stands allowed. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

ARUP KUMAR DAS High Court of Calcutta 9 th of April 2024 04:11:29 PM