Sanjay Das @ Shyamal v. State Of West Bengal

06.05.2022 Serial no.47 [Dd] (Bail Rejected) CRM (DB) 1205 of 2022 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Chinsurah Police Station Case No. 211 of 2021 dated May 11, 2021 under Sections 326/307/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25/27 of Arms Act, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1010/2021 subsequently charge sheet has been submitted being charge sheet no. 264 of 2021 dated July 09,2021 under Section 326/307/120B of the IPC and Sections 25/27/35 of the Arms Act.

-AndIn the matter of : Sanjay Das @ Shyamal ... ...Petitioner Mr. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Neguive Ahmed, ld. APP Mr. Iqbal Kabir, Advocate ... ...For the State Petitioner renews for bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated. There is no close circuit television footage implicating the petitioner. The arms recovered were not used in the incident. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor draws the attention of the Court to the earlier order of rejection dated March 23, 2022 passed in CRM (DB) 276 of 2022. He submits that the issue is closed circuit television footage was raised at that point of time. Arms were recovered from the house of the petitioner on the leading statement made by the petitioner. He refers to the seizure list. There is hardly any material change in circumstances subsequent to the earlier order dated March 23, 2022

passed in CRM(DB) 276 of 2022 rejecting the prayer for bail of the petitioner. The issue of close circuit television footage was raised at that point of time also.

In such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (DB) 1205 of 2022 is dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Kausik Chanda, J.)