← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/1001/2024rejected

Md. Nausad @ Sk Nowsad v. State Of West Bengal

2024-04-09Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Gaurang Kanth2 pages

09.04.2024 sdas rejected C.R.M.(DB) No. 1001 of 2024 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sankrail Police Station Case No. 1402 of 2021 dated 23.11.2021 under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1B)(a)/27(3)/35 of the Arms Act.

And In Re : Md. Nausad @ Sk. Nowsad .... petitioner Mr. Sandip Chakraborty Mr. Kaustav Das ....for the petitioner Mr. Antarikhya Basu Md. Aqib Badar ... for the State 1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits he is not the principal accused. He is in custody for two years and seven months. He prays for bail.

2.

Learned Counsel for the State submits vital witnesses who have named the petitioner are yet to be examined.

3.

We have considered the materials on record. It appears from the statements of the eye-witnesses viz. Nehal Khan and Md. Sohel that petitioner was a member of the group which had fired at the victim. In view of involvement of the petitioner in the murder and as vital witnesses are yet to be examined, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 12 th of April 2024 10:34:10 AM

4. Application for bail is, thus, rejected. 5.

We request the prosecution to examine the vital eyewitnesses i.e. CWs. 4 and 5 at the earliest. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By :

SHANTANU DAS High Court of Calcutta 12 th of April 2024 10:34:10 AM