Siddharth Agarwal v. Stcl Ltd

17.01.2023 Court : 37 Item : 07 Matter : FMA Status : DNP Transcriber : NANDY FMA 655 of 2022 with CAN 1 of 2022 Siddhartha Agarwal Vs.

STCL Limited Mr. Anirban Ray, Advocate Mr. Ankan Rai, Advocate Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Rai, Advocate Mr. Sayantan Das, Advocate Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocate ......for the Appellant Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee, Advocate Ms. Sanchita Barman Roy, Advocate ......for the Respondent Learned Advocate appearing for the appellant submits, on instruction, that his client does not intend to pursue the instant appeal; rather intends to pursue the remedy before appropriate forum.

In view of the above, the appeal being FMA 655 of 2022 and the connected application being CAN 1 of 2022 are dismissed for non prosecution.

However, the dismissal of the appeal will not prevent the appellant to exhaust the other remedies, if available, under the law.

(Harish Tandon, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)