Ananya Roy v. Abhishek Kumar Mishra And Others

Court No.

Item 138 ssi 25.04.

C.R.R. 1678 of 2025 In the matter of:- Ananya Roy Mr. Sumanta Chakraborty ...for the petitioner Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

Despite service, no one appears on behalf of the other side.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner filed an application for appropriate relief under the provision of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act on 27.02.2024. The opposite party appeared and the first date was fixed on 14.03.2024. Thereafter several dates went past. But, the proceeding has not been concluded. Even the prayer for interim maintenance allowance has not been considered yet. The petitioner filed her affidavit of assets. Yet, the learned Magistrate on 17.03.2025 fixed the next date as 20.09.2025 for interim hearing, filing WO, affidavit of assets and liability of both sides. First, long dates are being fixed even for consideration of interim maintenance allowance. Secondly, the order was passed without considering the fact that affidavit of assets has already been filed by the wife.

It appears that some delay has been occasioned in conducting the proceeding.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the learned trial Court is requested to conclude the proceeding in accordance with law and at the earliest, more particularly, to prepone the next date for hearing to a date in the month of July 2025 for filing of assets and liabilities by the respondent and written objections, so that the prayer for interim maintenance allowance of the petitioner can be heard out at the earliest.

With these observations and directions, the revisional application is disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible. (Jay Sengupta, J.)